Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25381 - 25390 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25381 - 25390 of 29985 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7289 - 2017-09-20
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7289 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109777 - 2017-09-21
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171747 - 2017-09-21
review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter Ballos
of confrontation, however, is an issue subject to de novo review. See generally State v. Webster, 156 Wis.2d 510
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14218 - 2014-09-15
of confrontation, however, is an issue subject to de novo review. See generally State v. Webster, 156 Wis.2d 510
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48078 - 2014-09-15
¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 210
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
—is a question of constitutional law” that we decide de novo. Id., ¶7 (citation omitted). Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26860 - 2014-09-15
—is a question of constitutional law” that we decide de novo. Id., ¶7 (citation omitted). Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26860 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 72
is “a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶ 2, 305 Wis. 2d 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199515 - 2017-12-12
is “a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶ 2, 305 Wis. 2d 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199515 - 2017-12-12
State v. Curtis Brewer
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7906 - 2007-03-19
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7906 - 2007-03-19