Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25391 - 25400 of 29832 for des.
Search results 25391 - 25400 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Tondalia K.
decides de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47, 49-50 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14634 - 2017-09-21
decides de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47, 49-50 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14634 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI 137, ¶40, 330
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63568 - 2011-05-02
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI 137, ¶40, 330
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63568 - 2011-05-02
State v. Daniel C. Tuescher
. App. 1996). This involves a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14459 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1996). This involves a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14459 - 2005-03-31
Carol Marie Bannigan v. Jeffrey Harold Johnson
is a question of law, which we generally review de novo. See Van Offeren, 173 Wis. 2d at 492. A circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15613 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we generally review de novo. See Van Offeren, 173 Wis. 2d at 492. A circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15613 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2010-01-19
those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2010-01-19
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
WI App 122 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP488 Complete Title of...
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69081 - 2013-04-23
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69081 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
751. We review decisions to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29516 - 2007-06-27
751. We review decisions to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29516 - 2007-06-27
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30519 - 2007-10-03
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30519 - 2007-10-03
State v. Kenneth M. Herrmann
review de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827 (1987). In my view, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15096 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827 (1987). In my view, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15096 - 2005-03-31