Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25391 - 25400 of 29740 for des.
Search results 25391 - 25400 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presented at trial ultimately was sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
presented at trial ultimately was sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Melvin Thompson
an unreasonable search is a question of law which we review de novo. See Edgeberg, 188 Wis.2d at 344-45, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13044 - 2017-09-21
an unreasonable search is a question of law which we review de novo. See Edgeberg, 188 Wis.2d at 344-45, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13044 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo, Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176706 - 2017-09-21
was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo, Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H. Ross
is a “constitutional fact” that we review de novo. Coerper, 199 Wis.2d at 221-22, 544 N.W.2d at 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
is a “constitutional fact” that we review de novo. Coerper, 199 Wis.2d at 221-22, 544 N.W.2d at 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brent J. Stubbe v. Guidant Mutual Insurance Company
DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶6 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4391 - 2017-09-19
DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶6 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion, an additional analysis is also required. We consider de novo whether a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218491 - 2018-09-05
postconviction motion, an additional analysis is also required. We consider de novo whether a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218491 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo, id., reviewing the Board’s decision, not the circuit court’s decision, see State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50842 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo, id., reviewing the Board’s decision, not the circuit court’s decision, see State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in violation of the Sixth Amendment is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15
in violation of the Sixth Amendment is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frederick Lee Pharm v. Byran Bartow
relief is available to the petitioner is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pozo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19706 - 2017-09-21
relief is available to the petitioner is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pozo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶¶9, 14, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453353 - 2021-11-16
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶¶9, 14, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453353 - 2021-11-16