Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25391 - 25400 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 25391 - 25400 of 58506 for speedy trial.
John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
and Sally Scheel. They argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that they had no rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11789 - 2005-03-31
and Sally Scheel. They argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that they had no rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11789 - 2005-03-31
Wood County Department of Health and Family Services v. Terry L. R.
within the twelve-month period following the trial of the matter. During closing arguments, the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31
within the twelve-month period following the trial of the matter. During closing arguments, the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31
W.H. Fuller Company v. George R. Seater, Jr.
Seater does not dispute the trial court’s finding of a contract implied in law, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13961 - 2005-03-31
Seater does not dispute the trial court’s finding of a contract implied in law, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13961 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years, which was entered upon his no contest plea after the trial court denied his Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110217 - 2017-09-21
years, which was entered upon his no contest plea after the trial court denied his Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Irvon L. Crawford
that of his codefendant, that the trial court should have ordered expert DNA testing of hairs recovered from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12647 - 2017-09-21
that of his codefendant, that the trial court should have ordered expert DNA testing of hairs recovered from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roberta L. Brunell v. Miljevich Corporation
Miljevich Corporation (hereinafter, Miljevich) and its insurer. Brunell contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14308 - 2014-09-15
Miljevich Corporation (hereinafter, Miljevich) and its insurer. Brunell contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14308 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking a new trial under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 In that motion, Northern alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
motion seeking a new trial under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 In that motion, Northern alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
David Kneer v. James M. Sarkauskas
for misrepresentation and negligence, the trial court erroneously entered summary judgment of dismissal.[1] They also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9302 - 2005-03-31
for misrepresentation and negligence, the trial court erroneously entered summary judgment of dismissal.[1] They also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9302 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Pierner v. Computer Resources and Technology, Inc.
mortgage held by Pierner. The trial court granted judgment in favor of WSB based on equitable subrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13043 - 2005-03-31
mortgage held by Pierner. The trial court granted judgment in favor of WSB based on equitable subrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13043 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when answering two questions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64357 - 2011-05-16
. He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when answering two questions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64357 - 2011-05-16