Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2541 - 2550 of 83180 for case code.
Search results 2541 - 2550 of 83180 for case code.
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
. Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 308.04(10). This proceeding concerns an ACRC decision originally made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5830 - 2005-03-31
. Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 308.04(10). This proceeding concerns an ACRC decision originally made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5830 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. Adm. Code § DOC 303.25,[1] relating to disrespect, and ordered Wiseman to serve two days adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
. Adm. Code § DOC 303.25,[1] relating to disrespect, and ordered Wiseman to serve two days adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
Paul Piikkila v. Tim Loritz
to Loritz was not in writing, as required by the Home Improvement Law, found in Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6820 - 2005-03-31
to Loritz was not in writing, as required by the Home Improvement Law, found in Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6820 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly M.H.
of the children’s code contemplate the exclusion of post-petition misconduct in a CHIPS case. Interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11963 - 2005-03-31
of the children’s code contemplate the exclusion of post-petition misconduct in a CHIPS case. Interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11963 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and attorney’s fees for violation of WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06 (through Feb. 2018), as well as damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208205 - 2018-02-08
and attorney’s fees for violation of WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06 (through Feb. 2018), as well as damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208205 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD
, COUNTY [write the county where your case is heard] Petitioner (person who completed petition
/formdisplay/CV-420.pdf?formNumber=CV-420&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-06-02
, COUNTY [write the county where your case is heard] Petitioner (person who completed petition
/formdisplay/CV-420.pdf?formNumber=CV-420&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-06-02
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5524 - 2017-09-19
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5524 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Beverly Drews v. Carol Marwede
but not a specific asset; for example, the transfer of $10,000. Howard S. Erlanger, Wisconsin’s New Probate Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25891 - 2017-09-21
but not a specific asset; for example, the transfer of $10,000. Howard S. Erlanger, Wisconsin’s New Probate Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481750 - 2022-02-08
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481750 - 2022-02-08