Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25401 - 25410 of 84085 for simple case search.
Search results 25401 - 25410 of 84085 for simple case search.
State v. Julie Dixon
and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order and remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order and remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the judgment roll, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
to the judgment roll, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
Michael G. Plourde v. Jeffrey W. Guettinger
based on the Plourdes’ default on this and other bank loans in a mortgage foreclosure case. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12579 - 2005-03-31
based on the Plourdes’ default on this and other bank loans in a mortgage foreclosure case. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12579 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152264 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288841 - 2020-09-17
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288841 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21