Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25411 - 25420 of 37909 for d's.
Search results 25411 - 25420 of 37909 for d's.
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: patricia d. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58770 - 2011-01-10
from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: patricia d. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58770 - 2011-01-10
State v. Russell B. Mott
, and that this was a Class D felony for which the maximum sentence was twenty-five years and a $100,000 fine. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25286 - 2006-05-30
, and that this was a Class D felony for which the maximum sentence was twenty-five years and a $100,000 fine. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25286 - 2006-05-30
Oshkosh ParaprofessionalEducation Association v. Oshkosh Area SchoolDistrict
authority. See § 788.10(1)(d), Stats. The arbitrator's interpretation is rational and not a perverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8513 - 2005-03-31
authority. See § 788.10(1)(d), Stats. The arbitrator's interpretation is rational and not a perverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8513 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
… were labeled and sealed.” He also noted on the form that the sample had been “[d]elivered by Dep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
… were labeled and sealed.” He also noted on the form that the sample had been “[d]elivered by Dep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” 1 Poole’s brief-in-chief cites only to his appendix in violation of WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843225 - 2024-08-28
.” 1 Poole’s brief-in-chief cites only to his appendix in violation of WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843225 - 2024-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to the operation of the institution. See Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.11(4)(d). We discern no violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
to the operation of the institution. See Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.11(4)(d). We discern no violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
barred unless a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05
barred unless a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05
[PDF]
State v. Cynthia A. Provo
Section 948.03(A). It’s a Class D Felony, that I mentioned before, with a maximum penalty of a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5600 - 2017-09-19
Section 948.03(A). It’s a Class D Felony, that I mentioned before, with a maximum penalty of a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 100.18 (2013-14),1 and requested compensatory and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147173 - 2017-09-21
. § 100.18 (2013-14),1 and requested compensatory and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147173 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James M.C.
program under s. 301.048. (d) The desirability of trial and disposition of the entire offense in one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13335 - 2017-09-21
program under s. 301.048. (d) The desirability of trial and disposition of the entire offense in one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13335 - 2017-09-21