Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25411 - 25420 of 63980 for records/1000.
Search results 25411 - 25420 of 63980 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Arnulfo Torres
be done on the record. The trial court reinterviewed the informant and the testimony was transcribed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8299 - 2017-09-19
be done on the record. The trial court reinterviewed the informant and the testimony was transcribed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8299 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634053 - 2023-03-22
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634053 - 2023-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
then filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
State v. Ruven Seibert
claim of error.[1] Also, the record suggests Seibert offered the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
claim of error.[1] Also, the record suggests Seibert offered the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems relevant. See id., ¶40. These objectives generally include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40992 - 2014-09-15
, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems relevant. See id., ¶40. These objectives generally include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40992 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228785 - 2018-11-28
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228785 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
of his injury when the record also contained a WKC-16-B “Practitioner’s Report in Lieu of Testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35009 - 2014-09-15
of his injury when the record also contained a WKC-16-B “Practitioner’s Report in Lieu of Testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35009 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. 2 Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103726 - 2017-09-21
not to do so. 2 Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
postconviction motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. Upon our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98555 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. Upon our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98555 - 2014-09-15