Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 57365 for id.

[PDF] NOTICE
, we apply the law to those facts without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶6 “Where the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standard of reasonableness. Id. at 687-88. Counsel’s strategic choices made after thorough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77061 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gary Curtis
.” Id. The hearing is important not only to give trial counsel a chance to explain his or her actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, 418, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998). We presume the trial court acted reasonably. Id. As long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49040 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict.” Id. Internal inconsistencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175422 - 2017-09-21

State v. James F. Neil
. 1972) (but court should not so instruct jury). Id. at 630, 468 N.W.2d at 734-35. We also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15187 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. Marshalek
of reasonableness presents a question of law and we are not bound by the trial court’s decision on that issue. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4219 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Id., ¶3-4. The Elward court held that it was an ex post facto violation to impose a DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21

State v. Matthew M. Engevold
U.S. at 687. A defendant has the burden of proof on both components. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13572 - 2005-03-31

State v. Cory C. Miller
must do its best to see that these concerns are attended to. Id. at 796, 496 N.W.2d at 708. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10623 - 2014-10-02