Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 57370 for id.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 57370 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
further. Id., ¶¶32, 49. ¶4 On April 12, 2006, Myartt filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36490 - 2014-09-15
further. Id., ¶¶32, 49. ¶4 On April 12, 2006, Myartt filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36490 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 392, 418, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998). We presume the trial court acted reasonably. Id. As long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49040 - 2010-04-20
Wis. 2d 392, 418, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998). We presume the trial court acted reasonably. Id. As long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49040 - 2010-04-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we apply the law to those facts without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶6 “Where the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
, we apply the law to those facts without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶6 “Where the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James F. Neil
-1137 (D.C. Cir. 1972) (but court should not so instruct jury). Id. at 630, 468 N.W.2d at 734-35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15187 - 2017-09-21
-1137 (D.C. Cir. 1972) (but court should not so instruct jury). Id. at 630, 468 N.W.2d at 734-35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15187 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and accepted meaning.” Id. Additionally, “statutory language is interpreted in the context in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882482 - 2024-12-03
, and accepted meaning.” Id. Additionally, “statutory language is interpreted in the context in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882482 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id. (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968). “[W]hat constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58159 - 2014-09-15
’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id. (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968). “[W]hat constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Karl Meyer
in the path of an officer gives rise to a violation of that statute. Id. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20
in the path of an officer gives rise to a violation of that statute. Id. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
; and (3) no other factors must exist which would constitute an abuse of discretion.” Id. at 625, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14894 - 2017-09-21
; and (3) no other factors must exist which would constitute an abuse of discretion.” Id. at 625, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14894 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gerald D. O'Brien
§ 343.44, Stats., and only a civil prosecution is available to the State in those circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15317 - 2005-03-31
§ 343.44, Stats., and only a civil prosecution is available to the State in those circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Id. at 694. A reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33209 - 2014-09-15
unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Id. at 694. A reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33209 - 2014-09-15