Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP1628-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205991 - 2017-12-27
. No. 2017AP1628-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205991 - 2017-12-27
State v. Tomas C. Cuesta
, whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of the victim’s criminal record and whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4614 - 2005-03-31
, whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of the victim’s criminal record and whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
silent. In this instance, however, the record establishes that McKoy orally agreed to continue speaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34360 - 2008-10-20
silent. In this instance, however, the record establishes that McKoy orally agreed to continue speaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34360 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the record, we conclude 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99709 - 2014-09-15
an independent review of the record, we conclude 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the record does not establish that he understood that the charges had been amended from one count of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33803 - 2014-09-15
the record does not establish that he understood that the charges had been amended from one count of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33803 - 2014-09-15
Michael L. Payne v. Judith A. Payne
to participate in the trial. The record does not support that argument. Because the delay is substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13480 - 2005-03-31
to participate in the trial. The record does not support that argument. Because the delay is substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13480 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
rational reasons for its decision and based its decision on facts in the record.” Id. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54971 - 2010-09-29
rational reasons for its decision and based its decision on facts in the record.” Id. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54971 - 2010-09-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498489 - 2022-03-23
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498489 - 2022-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93166 - 2014-09-15
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93166 - 2014-09-15