Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 25421 - 25430 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Racine County v. James P. G.
evidence “that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject’s individual treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19114 - 2017-09-21
evidence “that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject’s individual treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164161 - 2017-09-21
2 reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=633264 - 2023-03-15
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=633264 - 2023-03-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerald J. McDowell
as a response.1 After an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10593 - 2017-09-20
as a response.1 After an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10593 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492500 - 2022-03-10
, and has filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492500 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
substance. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2017AP2535-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239899 - 2019-05-01
substance. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2017AP2535-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239899 - 2019-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384803 - 2021-07-07
independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384803 - 2021-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis for challenging the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187654 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis for challenging the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187654 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
they represent a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90909 - 2012-12-20
they represent a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90909 - 2012-12-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1385-CRNM 2 review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640050 - 2023-04-04
. No. 2021AP1385-CRNM 2 review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640050 - 2023-04-04