Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25431 - 25440 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25431 - 25440 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
service of process mandated dismissal of the present case. In the previous action, a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
service of process mandated dismissal of the present case. In the previous action, a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
regarding the sentence, though it would be able to comment on the facts of the case and Vollmer’s criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
regarding the sentence, though it would be able to comment on the facts of the case and Vollmer’s criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
Ozaukee County Department of Social Services v. John D.
misinterpreted and misapplied WIS. STAT. § 48.24(5) to the facts of this case when it excluded evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5207 - 2017-09-19
misinterpreted and misapplied WIS. STAT. § 48.24(5) to the facts of this case when it excluded evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5207 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald L. Tappa
2002 WI App 303 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0247-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 303 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0247-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerome J. Blonien v. Charlotte Fleischman
actions” language found in the DNR case. Auchinleck, 200 Wis.2d at 594-97, 547 N.W.2d at 590-92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19
actions” language found in the DNR case. Auchinleck, 200 Wis.2d at 594-97, 547 N.W.2d at 590-92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
. In that case, Smejkal took his then fiancée’s vehicle to Milwaukee without her permission. The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
. In that case, Smejkal took his then fiancée’s vehicle to Milwaukee without her permission. The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, when his postconviction counsel began to look at the case, she found this statement in the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42498 - 2009-10-21
motion, when his postconviction counsel began to look at the case, she found this statement in the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42498 - 2009-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397266 - 2021-07-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397266 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
in § 767.01(2), we agree with that conclusion. No. 97-2692 4 over a given case, circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
in § 767.01(2), we agree with that conclusion. No. 97-2692 4 over a given case, circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lauer’s motions to add him as a party to the case, to grant him access to the eFiling system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
Lauer’s motions to add him as a party to the case, to grant him access to the eFiling system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27