Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25431 - 25440 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25431 - 25440 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242390 - 2019-06-17
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242390 - 2019-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS
before a court commissioner. In the present case, Halvorson was charged with OWI, fifth offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
before a court commissioner. In the present case, Halvorson was charged with OWI, fifth offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
. Griswold also appeals Judge John C. Albert’s decision not to recuse himself from the case. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104347 - 2013-11-13
. Griswold also appeals Judge John C. Albert’s decision not to recuse himself from the case. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104347 - 2013-11-13
[PDF]
Joann R. Alwin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
2000 WI App 92 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1957
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15787 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 92 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1957
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15787 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David R. Nott
2003 WI 17 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-2001-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16653 - 2017-09-21
2003 WI 17 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-2001-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This receivership case, resulting from an underlying breach-of-contract case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237538 - 2019-03-20
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This receivership case, resulting from an underlying breach-of-contract case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237538 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
service of process mandated dismissal of the present case. In the previous action, a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
service of process mandated dismissal of the present case. In the previous action, a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
regarding the sentence, though it would be able to comment on the facts of the case and Vollmer’s criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
regarding the sentence, though it would be able to comment on the facts of the case and Vollmer’s criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
describe the two objections. ¶5 The State’s case was based on the testimony of the victim, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481404 - 2022-02-10
describe the two objections. ¶5 The State’s case was based on the testimony of the victim, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481404 - 2022-02-10