Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25451 - 25460 of 58499 for speedy trial.
Search results 25451 - 25460 of 58499 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L. Olson
was given a five-year prison sentence. He argues that the trial court could not review a sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15
was given a five-year prison sentence. He argues that the trial court could not review a sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
entitles Nicolet Hardwoods to a new trial. Rather, we remand for the court to remove Pine River and Connor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
entitles Nicolet Hardwoods to a new trial. Rather, we remand for the court to remove Pine River and Connor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. At Rugg’s jury trial, evidence was introduced that on April 11, 2020, Rugg entered a home where Heidi
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
. At Rugg’s jury trial, evidence was introduced that on April 11, 2020, Rugg entered a home where Heidi
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
Wood County Department of Health and Family Services v. Terry L. R.
within the twelve-month period following the trial of the matter. During closing arguments, the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31
within the twelve-month period following the trial of the matter. During closing arguments, the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bee Bus Line
. Affirmed. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Bee Bus Lines (Bee) appeals from the trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11078 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Bee Bus Lines (Bee) appeals from the trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Earl Meredith
of the sobriety tests, the trial court asked Meredith’s counsel whether he would “concede the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15856 - 2017-09-21
of the sobriety tests, the trial court asked Meredith’s counsel whether he would “concede the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15856 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
.[1] Keri H. appeals orders terminating her parental rights.[2] Keri argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27
.[1] Keri H. appeals orders terminating her parental rights.[2] Keri argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27
City of Middleton v. Theresa J. Hennen
, the trial court issued a written decision affirming the municipal court conviction. None of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9919 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court issued a written decision affirming the municipal court conviction. None of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9919 - 2005-03-31
Ursula Skarvan Bocher v. Anthony Skarvan, Jr.
to the Kazmiers. Bocher argues that the trial court erroneously granted the Kazmiers’ motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15270 - 2005-03-31
to the Kazmiers. Bocher argues that the trial court erroneously granted the Kazmiers’ motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15270 - 2005-03-31
Andree Gentry v. Susan J. Wilson, M.D.
to Lavena Gentry on March 18, 1996.[1] Dr. Wilson claims that the trial court erred when it denied her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2614 - 2005-03-31
to Lavena Gentry on March 18, 1996.[1] Dr. Wilson claims that the trial court erred when it denied her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2614 - 2005-03-31