Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25461 - 25470 of 30191 for de.
Search results 25461 - 25470 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. James B. Williams
jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Davison, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5785 - 2017-09-19
jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Davison, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5785 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gogebic-Iron Wastewater Authority v. C.D. Smith Construction, Inc.
jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 179 Wis.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14653 - 2017-09-21
jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 179 Wis.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jerome Sellars
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
T & HW Enterprises v. Kenosha Associates
is instructive. Whether facts fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9314 - 2017-09-19
is instructive. Whether facts fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9314 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leonard T. Collins
. Stat. §§ 939.62 and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4299 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §§ 939.62 and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4299 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin D. James
166, 172, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). In particular, we review de novo the constitutionality of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18877 - 2005-08-30
166, 172, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). In particular, we review de novo the constitutionality of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18877 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 202. However, we review a circuit court’s decision on a motion to dismiss de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091929 - 2026-03-17
N.W.2d 202. However, we review a circuit court’s decision on a motion to dismiss de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091929 - 2026-03-17
[PDF]
Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
of Chapter 102 of the Wisconsin Statutes. 4 A question of law is therefore presented, which we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16895 - 2017-09-21
of Chapter 102 of the Wisconsin Statutes. 4 A question of law is therefore presented, which we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16895 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Philip M. Canon
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis.2d 739, 758, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14880 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis.2d 739, 758, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact which we review de novo, but with the benefit of the trial court’s analysis. Ernst, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75747 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional fact which we review de novo, but with the benefit of the trial court’s analysis. Ernst, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75747 - 2014-09-15