Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25461 - 25470 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25461 - 25470 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings is de novo. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147292 - 2015-08-30
of a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings is de novo. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147292 - 2015-08-30
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
of § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2012-01-05
of § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2012-01-05
2007 WI APP 36
and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27
and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
) and apply it to undisputed facts. We review the interpretation and application of the statute de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28
) and apply it to undisputed facts. We review the interpretation and application of the statute de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28
Frontsheet
erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126603 - 2014-11-06
erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126603 - 2014-11-06
State v. Gary L. Everts
of the habitual criminality statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Price, 231 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5745 - 2005-03-31
of the habitual criminality statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Price, 231 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5745 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57825 - 2010-12-13
for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57825 - 2010-12-13
State v. Tony M. Smith
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
John Stoppleworth v. Refuse Hideaway, Inc.
or constitutional right to name all parties joined in a lawsuit. This is a question of law which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16885 - 2005-03-31
or constitutional right to name all parties joined in a lawsuit. This is a question of law which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16885 - 2005-03-31