Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25461 - 25470 of 29740 for des.
Search results 25461 - 25470 of 29740 for des.
Frontsheet
de novo. John Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. If the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68173 - 2011-07-18
de novo. John Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. If the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68173 - 2011-07-18
[PDF]
WI 78
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review a circuit court's grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52070 - 2014-09-15
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review a circuit court's grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 89
. No deference is granted to the referee's conclusions of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶4. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38090 - 2014-09-15
. No deference is granted to the referee's conclusions of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶4. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Ehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622217 - 2023-02-14
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Ehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622217 - 2023-02-14
State v. Colleen E. Hansen
into a de novo statutory interpretation of § 961.45, thereby ignoring the longstanding rule that this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17512 - 2005-03-31
into a de novo statutory interpretation of § 961.45, thereby ignoring the longstanding rule that this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel performed deficiently and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
review de novo whether counsel performed deficiently and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
Frontsheet
)(a). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2010 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68175 - 2011-07-18
)(a). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2010 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68175 - 2011-07-18
State v. Tory M. Meyer
guarantees de novo. See State v. Andrews, 201 Wis. 2d 383, 389, 549 N.W.2d 210 (1996). ¶19 In Leidner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17140 - 2005-03-31
guarantees de novo. See State v. Andrews, 201 Wis. 2d 383, 389, 549 N.W.2d 210 (1996). ¶19 In Leidner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17140 - 2005-03-31
Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
of public officer immunity presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16404 - 2005-03-31
of public officer immunity presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
the provisions of § 346.65(2m)(a). Statutory interpretation is reviewed de novo. Burg v. Cincinnati Cas. Ins
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16556 - 2017-09-21
the provisions of § 346.65(2m)(a). Statutory interpretation is reviewed de novo. Burg v. Cincinnati Cas. Ins
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16556 - 2017-09-21