Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25471 - 25480 of 57151 for id.
Search results 25471 - 25480 of 57151 for id.
State v. Eugene F. Line
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. at 372, 432 N.W.2d at 96. In exercising discretion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9257 - 2017-09-19
an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. at 372, 432 N.W.2d at 96. In exercising discretion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
tests. See id., ¶¶2, 4, 9-10, 53-54. Hams’s argument rests No. 2015AP2656-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170917 - 2017-09-21
tests. See id., ¶¶2, 4, 9-10, 53-54. Hams’s argument rests No. 2015AP2656-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exists for doing so. Id., ¶26. A “fair and just” reason means some adequate reason for a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272858 - 2020-07-28
exists for doing so. Id., ¶26. A “fair and just” reason means some adequate reason for a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272858 - 2020-07-28
2010 WI APP 57
. Id. ¶6 Brimer argues the statement he gave to his parole officer was compelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
. Id. ¶6 Brimer argues the statement he gave to his parole officer was compelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Nadaniel P. Jones
, all of the occupants of that vehicle have standing to challenge the seizure. Id. at 257. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
, all of the occupants of that vehicle have standing to challenge the seizure. Id. at 257. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Stank
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but will review independently the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Id. ¶8 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135400 - 2017-09-21
, but will review independently the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Id. ¶8 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
lawyer’s acts or omissions were not reasonable under prevailing professional norms. Id. at 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
lawyer’s acts or omissions were not reasonable under prevailing professional norms. Id. at 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
.” Id. This is also the central focus of the Children’s Code as a whole. Id.; WIS. STAT. § 48.01(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3620 - 2017-09-19
.” Id. This is also the central focus of the Children’s Code as a whole. Id.; WIS. STAT. § 48.01(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3620 - 2017-09-19