Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25481 - 25490 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25481 - 25490 of 29985 for de.
Frontsheet
was that court's improper de novo weighing of the evidence. When the evidence is reviewed under the proper
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143992 - 2015-07-06
was that court's improper de novo weighing of the evidence. When the evidence is reviewed under the proper
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143992 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed in part. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92280 - 2014-09-15
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed in part. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of which involve questions of law we review de novo. See Milwaukee Journal Sentinel v. DOA, 2009 WI 79
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242640 - 2019-06-21
of which involve questions of law we review de novo. See Milwaukee Journal Sentinel v. DOA, 2009 WI 79
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242640 - 2019-06-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
was deficient and prejudicial to his . . . client's defense is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242539 - 2019-08-22
was deficient and prejudicial to his . . . client's defense is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242539 - 2019-08-22
Todd Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics Machinery
, 283, 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998). We review these issues de novo, without deference to the trial court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16470 - 2005-03-31
, 283, 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998). We review these issues de novo, without deference to the trial court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo." C.S., 391 Wis. 2d 35, ¶13. ¶17 K.E.K.'s argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333694 - 2021-03-22
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo." C.S., 391 Wis. 2d 35, ¶13. ¶17 K.E.K.'s argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333694 - 2021-03-22
Frontsheet
de novo. John Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. If the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68173 - 2011-12-19
de novo. John Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. If the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68173 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If the postconviction motion “does not raise facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464379 - 2021-12-21
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If the postconviction motion “does not raise facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464379 - 2021-12-21
[PDF]
WI APP 122
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial court applied the incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial court applied the incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16388 - 2017-09-21
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16388 - 2017-09-21