Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25481 - 25490 of 63486 for records/1000.
Search results 25481 - 25490 of 63486 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1136-CRNM 2 Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757129 - 2024-01-30
. No. 2023AP1136-CRNM 2 Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757129 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2006AP3151-CR 5 ¶10 Moreover, the record demonstrates an appropriate exercise of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2006AP3151-CR 5 ¶10 Moreover, the record demonstrates an appropriate exercise of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512468 - 2022-04-21
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512468 - 2022-04-21
Sheboygan County Department of Health & Human Services v. Julie A.B.
standard in arriving at its decision. We disagree. After examining the exhibits and the record, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4106 - 2005-03-31
standard in arriving at its decision. We disagree. After examining the exhibits and the record, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Clements
not reverse. This record does not show that the trial judge’s factual finding was clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
not reverse. This record does not show that the trial judge’s factual finding was clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John A. Nutt
and Inspection requesting, among other things, that the State provide “[a]ny relevant written or recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
and Inspection requesting, among other things, that the State provide “[a]ny relevant written or recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche
of the motion only if the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. We consider the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12765 - 2005-03-31
of the motion only if the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. We consider the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12765 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
independently review the record to determine if it provides a further basis for the trial court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50883 - 2010-06-15
independently review the record to determine if it provides a further basis for the trial court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50883 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, No. 2018AP923 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21
and record, No. 2018AP923 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
Otto Radke v. Plantation Village Limited Partnership
in the record. We see no erroneous exercise of trial-court discretion. 4. The Counterclaim. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10634 - 2017-09-20
in the record. We see no erroneous exercise of trial-court discretion. 4. The Counterclaim. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10634 - 2017-09-20