Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25491 - 25500 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25491 - 25500 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis. 2d 350, 936 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963440 - 2025-05-30
interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis. 2d 350, 936 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963440 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel performed deficiently and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
review de novo whether counsel performed deficiently and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
Frontsheet
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶4. We determine de novo the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38090 - 2009-07-20
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶4. We determine de novo the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38090 - 2009-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Ehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622217 - 2023-02-14
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Ehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622217 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
WI 78
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review a circuit court's grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52070 - 2014-09-15
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review a circuit court's grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed in part. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92280 - 2014-09-15
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed in part. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92280 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
. § 82.21(2). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68080 - 2011-07-18
. § 82.21(2). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68080 - 2011-07-18
Frontsheet
de novo. John Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. If the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68173 - 2011-07-18
de novo. John Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. If the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68173 - 2011-07-18
Frontsheet
)(a). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2010 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68175 - 2011-07-18
)(a). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2010 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68175 - 2011-07-18
Todd Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics Machinery
, 283, 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998). We review these issues de novo, without deference to the trial court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16470 - 2005-03-31
, 283, 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998). We review these issues de novo, without deference to the trial court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16470 - 2005-03-31