Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentences comport with statutory requirements. This presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
sentences comport with statutory requirements. This presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Hess
was voluntarily and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
was voluntarily and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298272 - 2020-10-22
Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298272 - 2020-10-22
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Court. Before his current role, Hoffer worked at De La Mora & De La Mora in Elm Grove, representing
/news/thirdbranch/aug24/judappointments.htm - 2026-02-16
Court. Before his current role, Hoffer worked at De La Mora & De La Mora in Elm Grove, representing
/news/thirdbranch/aug24/judappointments.htm - 2026-02-16
2010 WI APP 16
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45061 - 2014-01-07
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45061 - 2014-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125. ¶6 William contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35671 - 2009-03-03
. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125. ¶6 William contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35671 - 2009-03-03
Didion, Inc. v. Ervin Prohaska
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Armstrong v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13348 - 2005-03-31
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Armstrong v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13348 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Metz
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2009-09-28
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2009-09-28
Lisa K. Lepak v. Bryan D. Johnvin
is de novo. We apply the standards set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same manner as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8656 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. We apply the standards set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same manner as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner.” Creative did not seek de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944763 - 2025-04-24
in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner.” Creative did not seek de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944763 - 2025-04-24