Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 17244 for probate/1000.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 17244 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
Burnett County v. AFSCME Local 279-A
the Burnett County register in probate, a municipal employee, had properly been removed from the bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
the Burnett County register in probate, a municipal employee, had properly been removed from the bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
. A probation and parole agent completed a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) before the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
. A probation and parole agent completed a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) before the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP1403-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF222
withheld sentence and placed Fernandez on two years’ probation with a condition that he serve fifty
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33154 - 2014-09-15
withheld sentence and placed Fernandez on two years’ probation with a condition that he serve fifty
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 42
as the present case, 2020CF33. For both cases, the court placed Dachelet on probation for 30 months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973433 - 2025-08-21
as the present case, 2020CF33. For both cases, the court placed Dachelet on probation for 30 months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973433 - 2025-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Blount’s attorney that Blount needed “some probation time.” The court imposed and stayed ninety-days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
with Blount’s attorney that Blount needed “some probation time.” The court imposed and stayed ninety-days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
. The trial court withheld sentencing and placed Koenig on three years of probation.[2] Koenig’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court withheld sentencing and placed Koenig on three years of probation.[2] Koenig’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15