Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 59798 for quit claim deed.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 59798 for quit claim deed.
Doris H. Krohn v. Jerome Krohn
rests upon the party asserting the claim. Spindler v. Spindler, No. 96-0591, slip op. at 5 (Wis. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
rests upon the party asserting the claim. Spindler v. Spindler, No. 96-0591, slip op. at 5 (Wis. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
sales method, in violation of § 70.32(1), Stats.[1] At the hearing on their objection, they claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31
sales method, in violation of § 70.32(1), Stats.[1] At the hearing on their objection, they claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), Stats. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
to § 948.40(1), Stats. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a GAL’s participation in an appeal. We reject Przytarski’s claim that the court’s explanations amounted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99716 - 2014-09-15
a GAL’s participation in an appeal. We reject Przytarski’s claim that the court’s explanations amounted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99716 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
would be preserved for appellate review and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2011-03-28
would be preserved for appellate review and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising the judicial recusal and expert testimony issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61922 - 2014-09-15
and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising the judicial recusal and expert testimony issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61922 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. We reject Przytarski’s claim that the court’s explanations amounted to acting as Schwefel’s “advocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2015-05-07
. We reject Przytarski’s claim that the court’s explanations amounted to acting as Schwefel’s “advocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2015-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the decedent was in a long-term, nonmarital cohabitation relationship, filed a claim against the Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
the decedent was in a long-term, nonmarital cohabitation relationship, filed a claim against the Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a claim against the Estate asserting entitlement to one-half of the proceeds from the sale of the couple’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2006-05-18
a claim against the Estate asserting entitlement to one-half of the proceeds from the sale of the couple’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2006-05-18