Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25501 - 25510 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 25501 - 25510 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Jeris M. Moore
an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25748 - 2006-08-29
an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25748 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“in dismissing Dr. Hartmann from all claims and causes of action” and in denying Winzer’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29
“in dismissing Dr. Hartmann from all claims and causes of action” and in denying Winzer’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734042 - 2023-11-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
school. ¶3 Judge McGinnis subsequently filed a motion for sanctions, alleging Jimenez had violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15
school. ¶3 Judge McGinnis subsequently filed a motion for sanctions, alleging Jimenez had violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
denying his motions for postconviction relief. Kasparec raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2008-02-05
denying his motions for postconviction relief. Kasparec raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2008-02-05
[PDF]
Daniel Shoop v. Samuel Carrasco
In a postverdict motion, Shoop challenged the sufficiency of the evidence of his and Williamson’s negligence.3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4147 - 2017-09-20
In a postverdict motion, Shoop challenged the sufficiency of the evidence of his and Williamson’s negligence.3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4147 - 2017-09-20
Jason M. Byford v. Michael Edwards
an order denying his motion for relief from a default judgment. Because we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2787 - 2013-03-26
an order denying his motion for relief from a default judgment. Because we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2787 - 2013-03-26
CA Blank Order
in discovery. On July 21, 2011, the circuit court convened a hearing to address the contractors’ motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95823 - 2013-04-23
in discovery. On July 21, 2011, the circuit court convened a hearing to address the contractors’ motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95823 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
postconviction motions seeking a new trial and sentence modification. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10504 - 2017-09-20
postconviction motions seeking a new trial and sentence modification. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10504 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order denying her motion for relief from a judgment terminating her marriage to Bruce Wozniak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235025 - 2019-02-20
appeals an order denying her motion for relief from a judgment terminating her marriage to Bruce Wozniak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235025 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
their motion for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The circuit No. 96-0596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10456 - 2017-09-20
their motion for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The circuit No. 96-0596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10456 - 2017-09-20