Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25501 - 25510 of 33975 for dismissed.
Search results 25501 - 25510 of 33975 for dismissed.
[PDF]
Charles and Carolyn Mills v. Board of Review of The Town of Dover
and dismissed the complaint. This appeal followed. Other facts pertinent to the appeal will be included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9404 - 2017-09-19
and dismissed the complaint. This appeal followed. Other facts pertinent to the appeal will be included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9404 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dorothy A. Lowe v. City of Appleton
on a jury verdict that dismissed her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of No. 95-1809-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9303 - 2017-09-19
on a jury verdict that dismissed her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of No. 95-1809-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9303 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John M. Baker v.
egregious, fined him $500, and dismissed him from handling the client’s appeal. No. 97-1154 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17250 - 2017-09-21
egregious, fined him $500, and dismissed him from handling the client’s appeal. No. 97-1154 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-in-chief, Martin moved for dismissal. The trial court took the motion under advisement until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
-in-chief, Martin moved for dismissal. The trial court took the motion under advisement until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty plea to the substantial battery charge, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119964 - 2014-08-25
guilty plea to the substantial battery charge, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119964 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
seeks reversal of the circuit court’s order, not dismissal of its appeal on the ground of mootness. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2005-03-31
seeks reversal of the circuit court’s order, not dismissal of its appeal on the ground of mootness. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
armed—were dismissed and read in. ¶3 At sentencing, the State recommended a global sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52538 - 2010-07-26
armed—were dismissed and read in. ¶3 At sentencing, the State recommended a global sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52538 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
charge, Card then moved for dismissal, arguing a double jeopardy violation. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2011-11-29
charge, Card then moved for dismissal, arguing a double jeopardy violation. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2011-11-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (1997-98), he filed a motion “to dismiss the … case or modify his consecutive (present sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29892 - 2007-08-06
. § 974.06 (1997-98), he filed a motion “to dismiss the … case or modify his consecutive (present sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29892 - 2007-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
and is dismissed. [2] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35017 - 2008-12-29
and is dismissed. [2] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35017 - 2008-12-29