Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25521 - 25530 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 25521 - 25530 of 58546 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s discretion. We affirm. ¶2 Kathy is a pharmacy technician who earns approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43221 - 2009-11-10
of the trial court’s discretion. We affirm. ¶2 Kathy is a pharmacy technician who earns approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43221 - 2009-11-10
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L. Olson
was given a five-year prison sentence. He argues that the trial court could not review a sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15
was given a five-year prison sentence. He argues that the trial court could not review a sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Gonzalez was convicted following a jury trial of attempted first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705850 - 2023-09-27
. Gonzalez was convicted following a jury trial of attempted first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705850 - 2023-09-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98819 - 2014-09-15
affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98819 - 2014-09-15
State v. James J. Bartow
or indirectly as a consequence of the arrest should have been suppressed. We conclude the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14097 - 2005-03-31
or indirectly as a consequence of the arrest should have been suppressed. We conclude the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14097 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and intelligent. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). At the plea hearing, the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113227 - 2014-06-03
and intelligent. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). At the plea hearing, the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113227 - 2014-06-03
State v. Joseph Scaro
after the trial court denied his motion to suppress based upon his claim of an illegal stop of his motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15391 - 2005-03-31
after the trial court denied his motion to suppress based upon his claim of an illegal stop of his motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15391 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luster Goodman, Jr.
. FINE, J. Luster Goodman appeals his jury-trial conviction for possessing cocaine. See §§ 161.16(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10553 - 2005-03-31
. FINE, J. Luster Goodman appeals his jury-trial conviction for possessing cocaine. See §§ 161.16(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelvin Gibson
for the decision. See State v. Lindh, 161 Wis.2d 324, 361 n.14, 468 N.W.2d 168, 181 (1991). At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10852 - 2017-09-20
for the decision. See State v. Lindh, 161 Wis.2d 324, 361 n.14, 468 N.W.2d 168, 181 (1991). At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10852 - 2017-09-20
State v. Phillip M. Ross
requests a new trial in the interest of justice.[1] Because we conclude that no hearsay evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27
requests a new trial in the interest of justice.[1] Because we conclude that no hearsay evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27