Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25531 - 25540 of 69083 for as he.
Search results 25531 - 25540 of 69083 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. David L. Canedy
assistance of trial counsel. The trial court concluded that Canedy was not entitled to relief because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7724 - 2017-09-19
assistance of trial counsel. The trial court concluded that Canedy was not entitled to relief because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7724 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jason Lieder v. Timothy Stanfield
judgment because Stanfield's intent remains at issue. He also argues that Stanfield's parents were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8703 - 2017-09-19
judgment because Stanfield's intent remains at issue. He also argues that Stanfield's parents were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8703 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James A. Loukota v. James P. Murphy
Institution, appeals from an order affirming a prison disciplinary decision. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10986 - 2017-09-19
Institution, appeals from an order affirming a prison disciplinary decision. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10986 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael Storzer
. § 948.025(1) (1997-98). He also appeals an order denying his motion to modify the sentence based on new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
. § 948.025(1) (1997-98). He also appeals an order denying his motion to modify the sentence based on new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Darnell Jackson v. Gary McCaughtry
, and therefore affirm. Jackson committed his violations on July 19, 1997. On July 21, he received a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13674 - 2017-09-21
, and therefore affirm. Jackson committed his violations on July 19, 1997. On July 21, he received a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13674 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald D. Laufer
him because he did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waive his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4041 - 2005-03-31
him because he did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waive his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4041 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to start making restitution payments. Brown’s written judgment of conviction does address when he would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92603 - 2013-02-04
to start making restitution payments. Brown’s written judgment of conviction does address when he would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92603 - 2013-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Pinter also argues he was entitled to partial summary judgment as to the Village’s negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210985 - 2018-04-10
. 2 Pinter also argues he was entitled to partial summary judgment as to the Village’s negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210985 - 2018-04-10
[PDF]
Frontsheet
standing. He has not been the subject of any previous disciplinary proceedings. ¶4 On August 3, 2015
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208492 - 2018-02-15
standing. He has not been the subject of any previous disciplinary proceedings. ¶4 On August 3, 2015
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208492 - 2018-02-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October
return of the child….” he said. “The guardian, at that point, can simply say, ‘no, you never met
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19860 - 2017-09-21
return of the child….” he said. “The guardian, at that point, can simply say, ‘no, you never met
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19860 - 2017-09-21