Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25531 - 25540 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 25531 - 25540 of 33989 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
to multiple charges and the State dismissed the rest. The court noted that Campbell had posted $3,000 bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83435 - 2012-06-06
to multiple charges and the State dismissed the rest. The court noted that Campbell had posted $3,000 bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83435 - 2012-06-06
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
Duncan v. Farm Credit Bank, 940 F.2d 1099 (7th Cir. 1991), in which the Duncans’ appeal was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Duncan v. Farm Credit Bank, 940 F.2d 1099 (7th Cir. 1991), in which the Duncans’ appeal was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Frontsheet
to notify her of the upcoming hearings, by failing to advise her of a December 2006 order dismissing her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03
to notify her of the upcoming hearings, by failing to advise her of a December 2006 order dismissing her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03
Helen Schlicht v. Bridget Mary VanDyke
, 261 Wis.2d 549, 661 N.W.2d 420, review dismissed, 2003 WI 32, 260 Wis. 2d 756, 661 N.W.2d 103 (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2005-03-31
, 261 Wis.2d 549, 661 N.W.2d 420, review dismissed, 2003 WI 32, 260 Wis. 2d 756, 661 N.W.2d 103 (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2005-03-31
The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
. The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition and various individuals (collectively, “LNC”) appeal an order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6656 - 2005-03-31
. The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition and various individuals (collectively, “LNC”) appeal an order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6656 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
alcohol concentration, both as an eighth offense. Dix moved to dismiss at the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14
alcohol concentration, both as an eighth offense. Dix moved to dismiss at the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14
State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
with these two charges only. It said: "I will accept [Hanson's] plea at this time. I will dismiss Count No. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
with these two charges only. It said: "I will accept [Hanson's] plea at this time. I will dismiss Count No. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and must be dismissed as untimely filed. In Andre’s view, this is so for three reasons: first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98731 - 2005-03-31
, and must be dismissed as untimely filed. In Andre’s view, this is so for three reasons: first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98731 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randall McConochie
which we assume was dismissed. [3] Sections 346.65(2) and 343.30(1q)(b) enhance the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31
which we assume was dismissed. [3] Sections 346.65(2) and 343.30(1q)(b) enhance the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donnie Cobbs
. Guttenberg negotiated a plea agreement in which the habitual criminality penalty enhancer would be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-03-31
. Guttenberg negotiated a plea agreement in which the habitual criminality penalty enhancer would be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-03-31