Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25531 - 25540 of 76664 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] WI App 70
will “not substitute [our] judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882268 - 2025-01-24

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgments and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARK A. SANDERS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378548 - 2021-06-22

WI App 61 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2112 Complete Title of...
permit, any proposed thermal effluent limitation established under s. 283.17 or any water quality based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111239 - 2014-05-27

State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] R.W. Docks & Slips v. State
). "[S]ummary judgment is proper where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17563 - 2017-09-21

R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
). ¶8 In contrast to the ALJ’s conclusions of law, the Board declared that “Dr. Nielsen[’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, oppressive, and unreasonable, representing its will and not its judgment. ¶2 For reasons set forth below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575800 - 2022-10-11

2008 WI APP 40
from a judgment of the circuit court for Columbia County: andrew p. bissonnette, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31950 - 2008-03-18