Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25531 - 25540 of 63951 for records/1000.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94295 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99788 - 2013-07-18

State v. Michael Mackessy
no citations to the record, contrary to his obligation under § 809.19(1)(e), even though this matter reaches us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31

Tammy L. Schwaller v. Michael A. Schwaller
but that Tammy and the children needed some stability. ¶3 Michael argues on appeal that the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3698 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky J. Fortier
information.” Accordingly, this court concluded that the record revealed no issues of potentially arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] State v. Shoua Y.
: (a) The personality and prior record of the child, including whether the child is mentally ill or developmentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10689 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Catherine Houtakker v. Gerald F. Houtakker
on the Home Farm; that nothing was due on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13867 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 The Suttons refer to the 1970s structure as a shed. Some documents in the record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804046 - 2024-05-21

Joan La Rock v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
and not contained in the appellate record, it is undisputed that her employment is on the Oneida reservation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15362 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. In the absence of a record on these claims, we will not address them. See State v. Krieger, 163 Wis.2d 241, 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31