Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25541 - 25550 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 25541 - 25550 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. James J. Bartow
conclude the trial court did not error in determining there was probable cause to arrest and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
conclude the trial court did not error in determining there was probable cause to arrest and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jed M. Bossell
. Bossell contends that the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence derived from a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13664 - 2005-03-31
. Bossell contends that the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence derived from a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13664 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. Kellie Ann Dixon
. Dixon claims the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12119 - 2005-03-31
. Dixon claims the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12119 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
BACKGROUND ¶2 Haywood was convicted, following a jury trial, of three counts each of kidnapping, second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133146 - 2017-09-21
BACKGROUND ¶2 Haywood was convicted, following a jury trial, of three counts each of kidnapping, second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133146 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia A.M. v. Patricia S.
) guardian of the person of Esther L.K., Patricia’s mother. She contends that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
) guardian of the person of Esther L.K., Patricia’s mother. She contends that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, denying his postconviction motion to reconsider the trial court’s May No. 2006AP1989 2006AP1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29110 - 2014-09-15
, denying his postconviction motion to reconsider the trial court’s May No. 2006AP1989 2006AP1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29110 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether he received effective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21
is whether he received effective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21
State v. Michael Ray Juber
ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and whether the sentence imposed was excessive. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and whether the sentence imposed was excessive. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
but does not compel the State to file a response; (2) whether Lewis’s trial counsel was ineffective in jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
but does not compel the State to file a response; (2) whether Lewis’s trial counsel was ineffective in jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
State v. Steven A. Johnson
. At sentencing, the trial court allowed the State to submit information on restitution within thirty days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9946 - 2005-03-31
. At sentencing, the trial court allowed the State to submit information on restitution within thirty days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9946 - 2005-03-31