Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25551 - 25560 of 57152 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
this issue in his no-merit response. The State is correct. His claim is barred. See id. ¶11 Next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16

State v. Maurice S. Ewing
they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, whether counsel’s conduct amounts to ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19333 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
meaning, the statute is clear and unambiguous, we stop the inquiry. See id. Simple disagreement about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92443 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant committed the same act and that the act constituted the crime charged. Id. (footnote omitted). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48055 - 2010-03-23

Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
the case so as to promote the best interests of the child.” Id. This is also the central focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3620 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. Id. No. 2007AP2751 7 ¶16 To prove ineffective assistance, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32636 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shirlene Davis
entry is not determined at the time the warrant is issued but, rather, when it is executed. Id., 520
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16037 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
factor justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶36-37. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314475 - 2020-12-15

[PDF] State v. James Evans
there is an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id. ¶5 “Consolidation is a procedural mechanism which avoids
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
may vary from case to case. Id. ¶11 In addition to the three primary sentencing factors, other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20086 - 2014-09-15