Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25551 - 25560 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 25551 - 25560 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Donald Dei v. Byron Dei
, Byron’s brother and a trust beneficiary, argues the trial court erred in denying his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6547 - 2005-03-31
, Byron’s brother and a trust beneficiary, argues the trial court erred in denying his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6547 - 2005-03-31
Patricia H.S. v. Richard Lee R.
. NETTESHEIM, J. Richard Lee R. appeals from trial court orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11228 - 2005-03-31
. NETTESHEIM, J. Richard Lee R. appeals from trial court orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11228 - 2005-03-31
State v. Phillip M. Ross
requests a new trial in the interest of justice.[1] Because we conclude that no hearsay evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27
requests a new trial in the interest of justice.[1] Because we conclude that no hearsay evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27
State v. Randy J. Smith
and the underlying commitment order. ¶2 After lunch on the second day of a jury trial, Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
and the underlying commitment order. ¶2 After lunch on the second day of a jury trial, Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
considers whether the trial court erred in denying Viera’s presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110011 - 2014-04-08
considers whether the trial court erred in denying Viera’s presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110011 - 2014-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
was a factor to consider when determining intent to deliver; (2) the trial court improperly prohibited him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29737 - 2007-07-16
was a factor to consider when determining intent to deliver; (2) the trial court improperly prohibited him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29737 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2273-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF28
of videoconferencing technology in any pre-trial, trial or fact- finding, or post-trial proceeding. (2)(a) Except
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64279 - 2014-09-15
of videoconferencing technology in any pre-trial, trial or fact- finding, or post-trial proceeding. (2)(a) Except
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64279 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Scaro
the trial court denied his motion to suppress based upon his claim of an illegal stop of his motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15391 - 2017-09-21
the trial court denied his motion to suppress based upon his claim of an illegal stop of his motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15391 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jed M. Bossell
. Bossell contends that the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence derived from a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13664 - 2005-03-31
. Bossell contends that the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence derived from a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13664 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. Kellie Ann Dixon
. Dixon claims the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12119 - 2005-03-31
. Dixon claims the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12119 - 2005-03-31