Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25561 - 25570 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25561 - 25570 of 30059 for de.
Paul D. Riegleman v. Eric J. Krieg
the contract is unambiguous, determining its meaning presents a question of law we review de novo. Pasko, 222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6658 - 2005-03-31
the contract is unambiguous, determining its meaning presents a question of law we review de novo. Pasko, 222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6658 - 2005-03-31
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
, then de novo review is appropriate.” Id. Hartman contends that they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10456 - 2005-03-31
, then de novo review is appropriate.” Id. Hartman contends that they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald R. Kustelski v. Robin L. Taylor
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George R. Bollig
was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered is question of constitutional fact, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14338 - 2014-09-15
was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered is question of constitutional fact, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14338 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294245 - 2020-10-06
v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294245 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶16 Our review of the circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976692 - 2025-07-02
.” STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶16 Our review of the circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976692 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
WI APP 40
, the interpretation and application of § 236.45(2) to these facts is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31950 - 2014-09-15
, the interpretation and application of § 236.45(2) to these facts is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31950 - 2014-09-15
Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc. v. David J. Peters
, 697 (Ct. App. 1994). We review summary judgments de novo. Id. Summary judgment is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
, 697 (Ct. App. 1994). We review summary judgments de novo. Id. Summary judgment is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nils V. Holmgren
review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178 Wis.2d at 148, 502 N.W.2d at 923
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14826 - 2005-03-31
review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178 Wis.2d at 148, 502 N.W.2d at 923
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If the postconviction motion “does not raise facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464379 - 2021-12-21
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If the postconviction motion “does not raise facts sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464379 - 2021-12-21