Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 69427 for as he.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 69427 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
level of 0.02. The State contended that he was appropriately assigned a maximum 0.02 level because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211060 - 2018-04-12
level of 0.02. The State contended that he was appropriately assigned a maximum 0.02 level because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211060 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on an eighteen- mile, high-speed chase that ended in Racine County. He was charged first in Racine County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199864 - 2017-11-01
on an eighteen- mile, high-speed chase that ended in Racine County. He was charged first in Racine County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199864 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
WI APP 180
. § 976.05 because he was not brought to trial within 180 days of his request for final disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15
. § 976.05 because he was not brought to trial within 180 days of his request for final disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven H.
), STATS., No. 96-1709-CR 2 1985-86.1 He also appeals the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10961 - 2017-09-19
), STATS., No. 96-1709-CR 2 1985-86.1 He also appeals the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10961 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for resentencing.1 Knutson argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22
motion for resentencing.1 Knutson argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22
State v. Steven H.
-86.[1] He also appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Steven claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10961 - 2005-03-31
-86.[1] He also appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Steven claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10961 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
while he had penis-to-vagina intercourse with her. ¶3 At disposition, the only disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103044 - 2013-10-14
while he had penis-to-vagina intercourse with her. ¶3 At disposition, the only disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103044 - 2013-10-14
2010 WI APP 160
and profane remarks. Joseph argues that he had a right to be present for the entire hearing under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57082 - 2010-12-13
and profane remarks. Joseph argues that he had a right to be present for the entire hearing under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57082 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas. He argues that the circuit court should have permitted him to withdraw his pleas because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190698 - 2017-09-21
pleas. He argues that the circuit court should have permitted him to withdraw his pleas because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190698 - 2017-09-21
Brent K. McFarland v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
McFarland was employed by NML as a field director from April 1, 1988, through October 1, 1993. As such, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13252 - 2005-03-31
McFarland was employed by NML as a field director from April 1, 1988, through October 1, 1993. As such, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13252 - 2005-03-31