Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 29985 for de.
State v. Michael Doud
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶29 The trial court determined that Leonard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶29 The trial court determined that Leonard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶20 For purposes of resolving this appeal, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶20 For purposes of resolving this appeal, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 4
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302, 307, 414 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36035 - 2014-09-15
offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302, 307, 414 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36035 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on January 20, 2024. Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763680 - 2024-02-15
on January 20, 2024. Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763680 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
source omitted). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190894 - 2017-09-21
source omitted). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190894 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WI App 80, ¶18, 365 Wis. 2d 257, 872 N.W.2d 357 (“Without any facts on which to base our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840302 - 2024-08-20
WI App 80, ¶18, 365 Wis. 2d 257, 872 N.W.2d 357 (“Without any facts on which to base our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840302 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233572 - 2019-01-29
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233572 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
Donald R. Kustelski v. Robin L. Taylor
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19