Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 29796 for des.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 29796 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Richard W. Delaney
de novo. State v. Ray, 166 Wis. 2d 855, 872, 481 N.W.2d 288 (Ct. App. 1992). The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3861 - 2017-09-20
de novo. State v. Ray, 166 Wis. 2d 855, 872, 481 N.W.2d 288 (Ct. App. 1992). The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3861 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061956 - 2026-01-13
review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061956 - 2026-01-13
Village of Hobart v. Brown County
We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6685 - 2005-03-31
We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6685 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barry A. Kundert
rights were violated, we decide the question de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3442 - 2017-09-19
rights were violated, we decide the question de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3442 - 2017-09-19
State v. Keith B. Kelly
in any of its findings. De Novo Review of Constitutional Facts ¶23 We independently review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
in any of its findings. De Novo Review of Constitutional Facts ¶23 We independently review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21
R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Lewis Flynn
is subject to de novo review. Id. at 114. ¶16 Flynn argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06
is subject to de novo review. Id. at 114. ¶16 Flynn argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06