Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 29740 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 4
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302, 307, 414 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36035 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on January 20, 2024. Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763680 - 2024-02-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
source omitted). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
WI App 80, ¶18, 365 Wis. 2d 257, 872 N.W.2d 357 (“Without any facts on which to base our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840302 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233572 - 2019-01-29

[PDF] Donald R. Kustelski v. Robin L. Taylor
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Nu-Roc Nursing Home, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
, administrative regulations and federal guidelines are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 66, 515 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9205 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Shirley Krug v. Cathy S. Zeuske
contracts as a result of the 1982 interdepartmental memorandum. Our review of summary judgments is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8336 - 2017-09-19

Diane Brandmiller v. Phillip Arreola
they violate her right to travel.[3] As to the constitutional aspects of this case, our review is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16879 - 2005-03-31