Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Donald Leiser
erroneous exercise of discretion standard. Id. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20285 - 2017-09-21

State v. Paul E. Magnuson
period of time.” Id. at 325, 558 N.W.2d at 645. We agree that Collett requires a case-by-case analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Andrew L. Reiman
of the evidence, but we independently apply constitutional principles to those facts. Id. ¶10 In Wong Sun v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21404 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be a sufficient reason for failing to raise an available claim in an earlier motion or on direct appeal.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10

State v. John A. Mahoney
. Id. at ¶5. Whether the facts as found constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3009 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Facto Clauses of the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions.” See id., ¶¶1-2. 3 The Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215640 - 2018-07-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.2d 752 (1990). The jury is the sole arbiter of witness credibility. See id. at 506. The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jason M. Mulroy
, this court is limited to determining whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6594 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Deficient performance and prejudice are both mixed questions of fact and law. Id., ¶18. “We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08

[PDF] Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
formation apply and yet formality is not essential. Id. “[T]he relationship may be implied from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21