Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 63389 for records.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 63389 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court determined that his claims were barred. Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
court determined that his claims were barred. Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
Charles A. Poindexter II v. Pamela J. Kagan
that Poindexter’s proven record of sexual abuse constituted a “huge change of circumstances,” noting that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21
that Poindexter’s proven record of sexual abuse constituted a “huge change of circumstances,” noting that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court determined that his claims were barred. Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
court determined that his claims were barred. Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
State v. Mark S. Barrows
). Thus, even if Cooksey’s state of mind was other than that reflected in the record, because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11832 - 2005-03-31
). Thus, even if Cooksey’s state of mind was other than that reflected in the record, because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because a different factfinder could draw opposing inferences from the record. Appellate courts search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195010 - 2017-09-21
because a different factfinder could draw opposing inferences from the record. Appellate courts search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134027 - 2017-09-21
of ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134027 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the record, we affirm. No. 2013AP532-FT 2 In 2009, AIC sued Parins and two other former
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101732 - 2017-09-21
and the record, we affirm. No. 2013AP532-FT 2 In 2009, AIC sued Parins and two other former
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101732 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844636 - 2024-09-04
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844636 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Jewell Carl Triplett. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09
of Jewell Carl Triplett. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09