Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 25571 - 25580 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Maurizzi
that it was not interested in the report's recommendation. After considering Maurizzi's prior record, his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8212 - 2017-09-19
that it was not interested in the report's recommendation. After considering Maurizzi's prior record, his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585236 - 2022-11-03
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585236 - 2022-11-03
CA Blank Order
them on summary judgment. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133837 - 2015-01-25
them on summary judgment. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133837 - 2015-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886295 - 2024-12-11
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886295 - 2024-12-11
State v. Michael Mackessy
no citations to the record, contrary to his obligation under § 809.19(1)(e), even though this matter reaches us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31
no citations to the record, contrary to his obligation under § 809.19(1)(e), even though this matter reaches us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4408 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, after which the court dismissed Stewart’s complaint. The record before this court does not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100524 - 2013-08-07
, after which the court dismissed Stewart’s complaint. The record before this court does not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100524 - 2013-08-07
Catherine Houtakker v. Gerald F. Houtakker
on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee further asserted that Skemp’s notes showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13867 - 2005-03-31
on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee further asserted that Skemp’s notes showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13867 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of [§] 236.01 to be recorded.” Among other things, the 1929 plat contained an acknowledgement from the former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673635 - 2023-06-29
of [§] 236.01 to be recorded.” Among other things, the 1929 plat contained an acknowledgement from the former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673635 - 2023-06-29
[PDF]
Catherine Houtakker v. Gerald F. Houtakker
on the Home Farm; that nothing was due on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13867 - 2014-09-15
on the Home Farm; that nothing was due on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 125
for the Record to Consider on the Safety of [A.C.] and [A.C.'s] Relationship to the Riordan's [sic] Related
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91003 - 2014-09-15
for the Record to Consider on the Safety of [A.C.] and [A.C.'s] Relationship to the Riordan's [sic] Related
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91003 - 2014-09-15