Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
did not violate the Wisconsin Statute of Frauds and, therefore, denying Stangler’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142778 - 2015-06-03
did not violate the Wisconsin Statute of Frauds and, therefore, denying Stangler’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142778 - 2015-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
The motion for contempt that forms the basis for this appeal was filed by Green County corporation counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15
The motion for contempt that forms the basis for this appeal was filed by Green County corporation counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Scott E. Selmer
and in recommending that the motion of the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) for summary judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17380 - 2005-03-31
and in recommending that the motion of the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) for summary judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17380 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his postconviction motion. Robinson asks this court to vacate his three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208600 - 2018-02-20
from an order denying his postconviction motion. Robinson asks this court to vacate his three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208600 - 2018-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their motions after verdict. The issues we address on appeal are: (1) whether the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106494 - 2017-09-21
their motions after verdict. The issues we address on appeal are: (1) whether the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106494 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and requested a jury trial. The Department filed a motion for summary judgment, which Renee opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93091 - 2008-08-11
and requested a jury trial. The Department filed a motion for summary judgment, which Renee opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93091 - 2008-08-11
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Scott E. Selmer
and in recommending that the motion of the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17380 - 2017-09-21
and in recommending that the motion of the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order that denied his postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12). 1 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109089 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order that denied his postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12). 1 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109089 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
court that denied, without a hearing, his postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas.[1] Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105341 - 2013-12-04
court that denied, without a hearing, his postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas.[1] Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105341 - 2013-12-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting John Doman’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Jennifer and John contend, among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871872 - 2024-11-05
granting John Doman’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Jennifer and John contend, among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871872 - 2024-11-05