Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 33767 for dismissal.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 33767 for dismissal.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the seven counts he faced. The remaining counts were dismissed and read in. During the sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
of the seven counts he faced. The remaining counts were dismissed and read in. During the sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pleaded no contest to one count of third-degree sexual assault, and the remaining counts were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
pleaded no contest to one count of third-degree sexual assault, and the remaining counts were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Henry A. Phillips
to the bail jumping charge as a repeat offender. Under the agreement, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15
to the bail jumping charge as a repeat offender. Under the agreement, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The court dismissed as moot Yandel’s claim requesting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14
unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The court dismissed as moot Yandel’s claim requesting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
Charles A. Polesky v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
§§ 111.31-.34, STATS. After a hearing, the administrative law judge dismissed Polesky’s claim, and LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14007 - 2014-09-15
§§ 111.31-.34, STATS. After a hearing, the administrative law judge dismissed Polesky’s claim, and LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14007 - 2014-09-15
Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
, we dismiss the State’s argument without further comment. By the Court.—Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
, we dismiss the State’s argument without further comment. By the Court.—Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Carthage
of the charges were dismissed but read into the record at sentencing. ¶5 The circuit court eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19
of the charges were dismissed but read into the record at sentencing. ¶5 The circuit court eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is biased and should be dismissed from the jury panel for cause is a matter of the [trial] court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252022 - 2020-01-02
is biased and should be dismissed from the jury panel for cause is a matter of the [trial] court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252022 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Selmer Company appeals an order dismissing its claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70621 - 2014-09-15
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Selmer Company appeals an order dismissing its claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70621 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a series of pro se motions challenging the restitution order. The circuit court dismissed the first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21
a series of pro se motions challenging the restitution order. The circuit court dismissed the first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21