Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 65165 for or b.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 65165 for or b.
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
following the conclusion of postconviction proceedings; (b) The defendant is not likely to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
following the conclusion of postconviction proceedings; (b) The defendant is not likely to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
County: Allan B. Torhorst, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Kloppenburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132115 - 2014-12-22
County: Allan B. Torhorst, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Kloppenburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132115 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Tyler
to such a level to compel this court to conclude that it forms the basis of a due process violation. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13121 - 2017-09-21
to such a level to compel this court to conclude that it forms the basis of a due process violation. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13121 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(b)3., (d)2. The guilty plea questionnaire form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240969 - 2019-05-17
of extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(b)3., (d)2. The guilty plea questionnaire form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240969 - 2019-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
either were met or were extended for good cause and without objection. See WIS. STAT. § 48.315(1)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123240 - 2017-09-21
either were met or were extended for good cause and without objection. See WIS. STAT. § 48.315(1)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123240 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duane R. Bull
counts of sexual exploitation of a child, contrary to § 948.05 (1)(b), Stats. Bull also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11558 - 2005-03-31
counts of sexual exploitation of a child, contrary to § 948.05 (1)(b), Stats. Bull also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11558 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
consequently find that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to bring such an objection. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
consequently find that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to bring such an objection. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karl H. Amenson
claimed deficiency. B. Sentence Modification ¶14 Amenson contends he is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5381 - 2017-09-19
claimed deficiency. B. Sentence Modification ¶14 Amenson contends he is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5381 - 2017-09-19
State v. Larry J. Wolf
through the procedural requirements or to point them to the proper substantive law.”[5] Id. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16196 - 2005-03-31
through the procedural requirements or to point them to the proper substantive law.”[5] Id. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16196 - 2005-03-31