Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 46138 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
that were tested were not Fields’ clothing. Fields apparently believes that his DNA would be found on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wameng Vang
or challenge the alleged breach. ¶4 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5519 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Savinski
diagnosis after reviewing Savinski’s records, administering a diagnostic test to Savinski and conducting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12522 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
]he question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102003 - 2013-09-16

[PDF] State v. City of Rhinelander
policy language, the subjective test set out in Logan is inapplicable. ¶11 Nonetheless, General
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3099 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
eyes were bloodshot and glassy. After conducting a series of field sobriety tests, most of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
alibi witnesses. The two-prong test for proving 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33046 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Reno D. Coffin
There is a two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel that the defendant is required to prove: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7298 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
. There is no contention 5 The test for harmless error has been stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34596 - 2014-09-15