Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 59393 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS
claim. We affirm on the appeal and dismiss the cross-appeal as moot. ¶2 In 2007, the Essers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99324 - 2013-07-16

Marathon County v. Faye P.
the thirty-day extension that had previously been granted. These claims present a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9604 - 2005-03-31

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Verlin H. Peckham
of a client in a small claims action, not pursuing reconsideration of the resulting judgment against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17452 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James D. Minniecheske
Minniecheske claims that had he known better, he would have defended himself on a different ground: he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12044 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dennis Jones
Court in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986),[1] Jones claims he was denied his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12322 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Schramm appeals from orders related to a post-verdict amendment of the judgment. Schramm claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2007-10-01

State v. Tony G. Merriweather
and sexual assault. Because we conclude that the bulk of Merriweather’s claims are procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12558 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
constitutional claims. 2 We considered and rejected such an argument in Patel, concluding that broadening
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189463 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Harold L. Johnson v. Don Dahle
. The dispositive issue concerning the state employees is whether public employee immunity bars a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13712 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nickie C. Brewington
. 2d at 509. In evaluating a speedy trial claim, the court must review each of the four factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18349 - 2017-09-21