Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 59386 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 59386 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Steinberger then sued Santander in small claims court, alleging that Santander’s actions had violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048622 - 2025-12-11
. Steinberger then sued Santander in small claims court, alleging that Santander’s actions had violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048622 - 2025-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”). The circuit court did not address Neuens’s Eighth Amendment claim when it denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165423 - 2017-09-21
”). The circuit court did not address Neuens’s Eighth Amendment claim when it denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165423 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
her sentence. She claimed the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20
her sentence. She claimed the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1985). Knuuttila claims that counsel failed to ensure he knew the elements of the crime or what
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366096 - 2021-05-13
(1985). Knuuttila claims that counsel failed to ensure he knew the elements of the crime or what
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366096 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the roadway. With respect to the first claim, this court has held that the initial decision to place a sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197298 - 2017-10-03
on the roadway. With respect to the first claim, this court has held that the initial decision to place a sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197298 - 2017-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a claim of newly discovered evidence, the defendant must prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66673 - 2014-09-15
on a claim of newly discovered evidence, the defendant must prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66673 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial counsel rendered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
. Nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial counsel rendered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
State v. Victoria D. Roesing
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] Roesing claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] Roesing claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Netzer
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS., as a second offense. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12587 - 2017-09-21
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS., as a second offense. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12587 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott A. Church
with these facts. ¶6 To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4954 - 2005-03-31
with these facts. ¶6 To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4954 - 2005-03-31