Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 25591 - 25600 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. David L. H.
is entitled to relief because the State violated the plea agreement, his trial counsel was ineffective when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5818 - 2017-09-19
is entitled to relief because the State violated the plea agreement, his trial counsel was ineffective when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5818 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason Halda
the car, we affirm. ¶2 Halda was convicted after trial of first-degree intentional homicide while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2300 - 2017-09-19
the car, we affirm. ¶2 Halda was convicted after trial of first-degree intentional homicide while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2300 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
told him. Korotka reviewed and signed the statement. ¶4 The trial court found that Korotka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
told him. Korotka reviewed and signed the statement. ¶4 The trial court found that Korotka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wayne K. Elworth
Elworth argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7357 - 2017-09-20
Elworth argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7357 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Randy C. Minder v. Nathan A. DeGross
observed DeGross’s condition. The trial court would not permit Ducklow to state his opinion whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15908 - 2017-09-21
observed DeGross’s condition. The trial court would not permit Ducklow to state his opinion whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15908 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David L. Schaub v. Wilson Mutual Insurance Company
The appellants argue that the trial court erred when it concluded that the respondents were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2158 - 2017-09-19
The appellants argue that the trial court erred when it concluded that the respondents were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2158 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. The issues are whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33923 - 2008-09-03
relief. The issues are whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33923 - 2008-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. Christopher Goetsch appeals a judgment, entered following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128261 - 2017-09-21
., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. Christopher Goetsch appeals a judgment, entered following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128261 - 2017-09-21
Montel Horton v. Gary Mccaughtry
On review of a summary judgment order, we adopt the same methodology as the trial court; our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8123 - 2005-03-31
On review of a summary judgment order, we adopt the same methodology as the trial court; our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8123 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, Meyers argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. He also accused his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145292 - 2015-07-28
, Meyers argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. He also accused his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145292 - 2015-07-28