Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25601 - 25610 of 29740 for des.
Search results 25601 - 25610 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or prejudiced the defense are questions of law for de novo review. Id. ¶20 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74929 - 2014-09-15
or prejudiced the defense are questions of law for de novo review. Id. ¶20 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74929 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott Leason Badker
of fact satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Dagnall, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16191 - 2017-09-21
of fact satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Dagnall, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16191 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 If a court finds that one prong of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795210 - 2024-05-01
are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 If a court finds that one prong of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795210 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32210 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32210 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 250
unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2006-12-19
unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
Rosa E. Fromm v. William P. Fromm
a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Friebel, 181 Wis. 2d at 293. In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2714 - 2017-09-19
a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Friebel, 181 Wis. 2d at 293. In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael E. McMorrow v. State Superintendent of Public Instruction
weight” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15526 - 2017-09-21
weight” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15526 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
2009, when Atlantic requested additional information concerning certain invoices and De Marco’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106012 - 2013-12-26
2009, when Atlantic requested additional information concerning certain invoices and De Marco’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106012 - 2013-12-26
Lenticular Europe, LLC v. William T. Cunnally
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31