Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25601 - 25610 of 63519 for records/1000.
Search results 25601 - 25610 of 63519 for records/1000.
State v. James C. Koepp
that the complainant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence. Jung v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11833 - 2005-03-31
that the complainant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence. Jung v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11833 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on unsupported assertions regarding mailing procedures that lack appropriate reference to the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251235 - 2019-12-12
on unsupported assertions regarding mailing procedures that lack appropriate reference to the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251235 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
Dodge County Human Services and Health Department v. Dean C.
is highly deferential: We look to the record to assess whether the circuit court reached a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16237 - 2017-09-21
is highly deferential: We look to the record to assess whether the circuit court reached a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we No. 2024AP663-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we No. 2024AP663-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1136-CRNM 2 Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757129 - 2024-01-30
. No. 2023AP1136-CRNM 2 Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757129 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Peterson
files and speaking with a client, the firm learned that its records did not reflect a retainer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25073 - 2017-09-21
files and speaking with a client, the firm learned that its records did not reflect a retainer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25073 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed by the [trial] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33618 - 2008-08-04
basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed by the [trial] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33618 - 2008-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
for an amount that does not appear in the Record and, apparently has not been disclosed to Flooring Brokers. CB
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28637 - 2007-04-02
for an amount that does not appear in the Record and, apparently has not been disclosed to Flooring Brokers. CB
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28637 - 2007-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
The only factual difference between this case and Morgan is that here the record is unclear if Zachary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
The only factual difference between this case and Morgan is that here the record is unclear if Zachary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36581 - 2009-05-26
State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
found and the record verifies that the officers reached the two men approximately one minute after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31
found and the record verifies that the officers reached the two men approximately one minute after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31