Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25601 - 25610 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Bernard L. Beyer
as is shown or is consistent with the report." Section 973.12(1), STATS. The issue whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
without a permit. The Vogts challenge the trial court’s finding that, No. 2013AP1056 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106847 - 2017-09-21

Jimi Thornton v. Walter S. Polacheck, M.D.
, and that the dismissal sanction was too severe. A trial court's decision to dismiss an action is discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8673 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William H. Roberts
. We affirm. No. 01-1639-CR 2 ¶2 Roberts seeks a new trial in the interests of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4091 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Trentt O. Kinison
that the trial court erred in allowing into evidence the breathalyzer and radar test results and that without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion without a hearing. The motion alleged ineffective assistance of trial and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94298 - 2013-03-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
individually polled; and (2) trial counsel was ineffective by failing to demand that each juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213521 - 2018-05-30

CA Blank Order
trial.[1] Golatt argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by excluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-08

CA Blank Order
is therefore structured differently from his sentence for count two. The trial court imposed a twelve-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112161 - 2014-05-06

Town of East Troy v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
and cleanup of the landfill site. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment and the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11351 - 2005-03-31