Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25611 - 25620 of 57346 for id.
Search results 25611 - 25620 of 57346 for id.
CA Blank Order
who is not in custody is not entitled to suppression of his statements. See id., ¶24. When facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122664 - 2014-09-23
who is not in custody is not entitled to suppression of his statements. See id., ¶24. When facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122664 - 2014-09-23
State v. Clarence E. Hill
needs of the offender; and (3) the need for protection of the public. Id. It is clear from our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8344 - 2005-03-31
needs of the offender; and (3) the need for protection of the public. Id. It is clear from our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, the application of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237562 - 2019-03-20
will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, the application of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237562 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
WI APP 3
to the plain language of the statute, id., which we give its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15
to the plain language of the statute, id., which we give its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is charged” and “[a]scertain[ing] personally whether a factual basis exists to support the plea.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
is charged” and “[a]scertain[ing] personally whether a factual basis exists to support the plea.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Conners
in a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” See id. at 355 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20799 - 2017-09-21
in a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” See id. at 355 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20799 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
professional judgment. Id. at 690. However, “every effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
professional judgment. Id. at 690. However, “every effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
him or her unfairly.” Id. at 894. Here, Kedinger contends that the trial court’s bias and partiality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
him or her unfairly.” Id. at 894. Here, Kedinger contends that the trial court’s bias and partiality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
2009 WI APP 64
for a crime he committed as a seventeen-year-old. Id. at 560. Although these cases do not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35690 - 2009-05-26
for a crime he committed as a seventeen-year-old. Id. at 560. Although these cases do not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35690 - 2009-05-26
Nicole R. Walton v. The Home Indemnity Corporation
, 916 (Ct. App. 1987). We decide the question of ambiguity without deference to the trial court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9177 - 2005-03-31
, 916 (Ct. App. 1987). We decide the question of ambiguity without deference to the trial court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9177 - 2005-03-31