Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25621 - 25630 of 82885 for case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012249 - 2025-09-23

[PDF] JC-1693; Petition in Juvenile Court for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Petition and Motion for Injunction Hearing (Harassment)
and/or Petition and Motion for Injunction Hearing (Harassment – 30711) Case No. -vs- Respondent
/formdisplay/JC-1693.pdf?formNumber=JC-1693&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-31

[PDF] Melvin R. Jones v. Jerome R. Poole
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1430 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679980 - 2023-07-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with intimidation of a witness, and the cases were joined for trial. A jury trial was held. H.S.H. testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307167 - 2020-11-24

[PDF] Dunn County v. Kelly D.
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3125 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jamale A. Bonds
of conviction in three misdemeanor cases to the complaint. In these prior cases, Bonds had been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19727 - 2017-09-21

Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
were factual rather than analyzing statutory and case law to resolve its motion, and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Ct. App. July 24, 2007) (Diekvoss I). The two cases involve different aspects of a reopened divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30228 - 2007-09-10