Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25631 - 25640 of 29985 for de.

[PDF] John L. Senty v. James A. Senty
. Standards of Review A. Summary Judgment ¶21 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24628 - 2017-09-21

Howard M. v. Jean R.
] and reviewing the legal issues de novo. DOR v. Exxon Corp., 90 Wis.2d 700, 713, 281 N.W.2d 94, 101 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7832 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky J. Fortier
(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] WI App 69
, a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Nowell v. City of Wausau, 2013 WI 88, ¶19, 351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284280 - 2020-11-11

COURT OF APPEALS
language. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Wisconsin Cent. Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58134 - 2010-12-22

[PDF] WI APP 40
, the interpretation and application of § 236.45(2) to these facts is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31950 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260629 - 2020-05-19

[PDF] WI APP 84
¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118462 - 2014-09-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
thought process based on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71741 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Darrin E. Parnell
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15999 - 2017-09-21