Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25631 - 25640 of 57708 for id.
Search results 25631 - 25640 of 57708 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Id. No. 2007AP2751 7 ¶16 To prove ineffective assistance, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32636 - 2014-09-15
. Id. No. 2007AP2751 7 ¶16 To prove ineffective assistance, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32636 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
). A reviewing court may dispose of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on either ground. Id. at 697
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
). A reviewing court may dispose of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on either ground. Id. at 697
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. A defendant who is not in custody is not entitled to suppression of his statements. See id., ¶24. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122664 - 2014-09-24
. A defendant who is not in custody is not entitled to suppression of his statements. See id., ¶24. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122664 - 2014-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and will uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. We then “review the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
, and will uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. We then “review the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
State v. James Ward
by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fidelis I. Omegbu v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
seeking injunctive relief. See id., 184 Wis.2d at 191, 515 N.W.2d at 893.5 Omegbu does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13074 - 2017-09-21
seeking injunctive relief. See id., 184 Wis.2d at 191, 515 N.W.2d at 893.5 Omegbu does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13074 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
will not disturb the Board’s findings if any reasonable view of the evidence sustains them. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15
will not disturb the Board’s findings if any reasonable view of the evidence sustains them. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the totality of the evidence could not have reasonably supported a finding of guilt. Id., ¶25. “We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580256 - 2022-10-26
that the totality of the evidence could not have reasonably supported a finding of guilt. Id., ¶25. “We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580256 - 2022-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Nadaniel P. Jones
, all of the occupants of that vehicle have standing to challenge the seizure. Id. at 257. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
, all of the occupants of that vehicle have standing to challenge the seizure. Id. at 257. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an objective standard of reasonableness considering all the circumstances.” Id., ¶34. “In evaluating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117225 - 2026-05-13
an objective standard of reasonableness considering all the circumstances.” Id., ¶34. “In evaluating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117225 - 2026-05-13